CROSS-CUTTING SYSTEMS

Enabling Systems

The connective tissue of sustainability.

Science, standards, certification, and coordination –
the systems that make sustainability actionable.

IN THIS SECTION

Science & Evidence(coming)
Standards & Certification(coming)
Stakeholder Coordination(coming)

In 30 Seconds

The 5-layer sustainability model describes the vertical stack from planetary foundations to corporate action. But layers don't function in isolation. Cross-cutting systems enable them to work together:

  • Science & AcademiaGenerates the evidence and understanding that informs everything else
  • Standards & MethodsTranslates science into measurable, comparable frameworks
  • Certification & AssuranceVerifies claims and builds trust in the system
  • Actor CoordinationAligns diverse stakeholders around shared goals

Why it matters: Without these systems, sustainability is just good intentions. With them, it becomes measurable, verifiable, and investable.

Where This Fits

Cross-cutting systems span all five layers, enabling them to function as an integrated whole:

L5: Corporate Action
L4: Policy & Governance
L3: Ecosystem Services
L2: Landscapes & Jurisdictions
L1: Planetary Foundations
CROSS-CUTTING SYSTEMS ← YOU ARE HERE
Science | Standards | Certification | Coordination

These aren't a layer – they're the infrastructure that connects layers. Science informs standards; standards enable certification; certification enables markets; coordination aligns actors across the whole system.

The Four Systems

Science & Academia

The evidence base for everything

Research institutions generate the understanding that informs policy, standards, and action. Without scientific consensus, there's no basis for targets or methodologies.

Climate Science

  • IPCC – Climate change assessment
  • Carbon cycle research – Informs carbon accounting
  • Climate modelling – Scenario analysis basis

Biodiversity & Nature

  • IPBES – Biodiversity assessment
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre – Planetary boundaries
  • Ecosystem ecology – Service valuation basis

Science evolves – and standards must follow. The shift from carbon-only to nature-positive reflects decades of accumulated ecological research.

Standards & Methodologies

Translating science into measurable frameworks

Standards convert scientific understanding into consistent, comparable frameworks that organisations can implement. Without standardisation, every claim is incomparable.

Measurement

  • GHG Protocol – Emissions accounting
  • LEAP – Nature assessment (TNFD)
  • Natural Capital Protocol

Target-Setting

  • SBTi – Climate targets
  • SBTN – Nature targets
  • Net Zero guidance

Disclosure

  • ESRS – EU reporting standards
  • ISSB – Global baseline
  • GRI – Impact reporting

Carbon Markets

  • Verra (VCS) – Largest voluntary registry
  • Gold Standard – SDG co-benefits focus
  • ICVCM – Integrity council
  • UK codes – Woodland, Peatland

Biodiversity & Supply Chain

  • BNG – UK mandatory biodiversity
  • EUDR – Deforestation regulation
  • FSC/PEFC – Forest certification
  • Rainforest Alliance

Standards proliferate – understanding which apply to your situation, and how they interact, is a significant navigation challenge.

Certification & Assurance

Verifying claims and building trust

Standards mean nothing without verification. Certification bodies and assurance providers check that claims match reality, enabling trust in the system.

Standard Governance

  • ISEAL Alliance – Credibility principles for sustainability standards
  • ISO – Management system standards (14001, 50001)
  • Accreditation bodies – UKAS, IAF

Verification

  • Big 4 accounting firms – Financial audit + ESG assurance
  • Specialist verifiers – SCS Global, Bureau Veritas
  • Project validators – RINA, DNV

The assurance gap: As sustainability disclosure becomes mandatory (CSRD), the demand for qualified assurers is outstripping supply. Organisations that build robust data systems now will be better positioned.

Greenwashing risk is real. Third-party verification is increasingly essential for credible claims.

Actor Coordination

Aligning diverse stakeholders around shared goals

Sustainability challenges span organisations, sectors, and jurisdictions. No single actor can solve them alone. Coordination mechanisms bring stakeholders together.

Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives

  • Roundtables – RSPO (palm oil), RTRS (soy), Bonsucro (sugar)
  • Coalitions – Business for Nature, We Mean Business
  • Landscape initiatives – Jurisdictional approaches

Networks & Platforms

  • UN Global Compact – Corporate sustainability commitment
  • CDP – Disclosure platform
  • WBCSD – Business leadership
  • Professional bodies – ISEP, IEMA, UKSIF

Collective action is powerful but complex. Pre-competitive collaboration enables progress that no single organisation could achieve alone.

How They Connect

Cross-cutting systems form a chain: science informs standards, standards enable certification, certification enables markets, coordination aligns actors.

Science

Evidence

Standards

Frameworks

Certification

Trust

Coordination

Alignment

Example: Carbon Credits

  1. 1.Science establishes that forests sequester carbon at measurable rates
  2. 2.Standards (Verra, Gold Standard) define methodologies for calculating credits
  3. 3.Certification bodies verify that projects meet methodology requirements
  4. 4.Coordination platforms (ICVCM, VCMI) align buyers and sellers on quality

Break any link in this chain and the system fails. Unverified credits. Incomparable claims. Lost trust.

Why It Matters for You

If You're Setting Strategy

Questions to answer:

  • Which standards apply to your sector?
  • What targets are credible?
  • Which coalitions should you join?

If You're Reporting

Questions to answer:

  • Which disclosure frameworks are mandatory vs voluntary?
  • What assurance will you need?
  • How do frameworks interact (CSRD + ISSB + GRI)?

If You're Procuring Credits

Questions to answer:

  • Which registry standards are credible?
  • What verification should you require?
  • How do integrity initiatives affect your portfolio?

If You're Developing Projects

Questions to answer:

  • Which methodologies fit your project?
  • What validation/verification is required?
  • How do you position for emerging markets?

The Navigation Challenge

Standards Proliferate

New frameworks emerge constantly. CSRD in Europe, ISSB globally, sector-specific initiatives, national requirements. Keeping track of which apply to you is a job in itself.

What was voluntary becomes mandatory. What was best practice becomes baseline.

Interoperability Gaps

Different frameworks measure different things, differently. GRI vs ESRS vs ISSB. Carbon accounting varies by standard. Mapping between them is complex.

Work is underway on interoperability, but gaps remain significant.

The meta-challenge: Understanding which standards, certifications, and coordination mechanisms are relevant to your specific situation – and how they interact – is where most organisations need help.

Navigate + Build

Understanding cross-cutting systems is part of navigation – knowing what exists and how it works. But implementing them requires capability:

  • Data systems to capture the evidence standards require
  • Reporting infrastructure to meet disclosure frameworks
  • Operating models to embed sustainability across functions

That's where our capability work connects.